Studies show that money lessons have to be relevant to kids' immediate experiences. By Janet Bodnar, Editor-at-Large June 27, 2011 Lately, financial education for kids and adults seems to be right up there with Mom and apple pie as a crowd-pleaser. Nearly everyone acknowledges that financial literacy is a worthy goal, and more than a dozen states require some form of personal-finance education in high schools. There’s just one problem: It doesn’t seem to be working. That was the sobering conclusion of a panel of experts at a conference on lifecycle saving and investing that I recently attended at Boston University. The problem, the participants agreed, is that broad-based efforts to improve financial literacy don’t hit people when they really need it. The best time to provide financial education, says Annamaria Lusardi, director of the Financial Literacy Center sponsored by the Rand Corp., Dartmouth College and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, is “when people actually have to make financial decisions.” (At Dartmouth, for example, new employees are given a simple, one-sheet walk-through of the retirement plan during orientation. The handout is then supplemented by short videos that explain such principles as compounding and diversification and offer profiles of real people telling how they save and invest.) The same is true of personal-finance curricula aimed at kids, says Lewis Mandell, a professor at the University of Washington’s Foster School of Business. After a career specializing in consumer financial behavior, Mandell has concluded that financial education doesn’t have a lasting impact on financial literacy. He ticked off a number of problems: Lessons aren’t “sticky,” to use the Web vernacular. Classes are generally one-offs that aren’t reinforced. And the subject matter isn’t relevant to kids’ immediate experiences -- not unlike trigonometry. Paul Solman, economics correspondent for The PBS NewsHour, noted that a long-term study in New Zealand has shown that adult financial habits can be determined as young as age 3. Children with the least amount of self-control at that age have the most difficulty managing their money as adults. Advertisement To improve self-control among kids, the study’s associate director, Terrie Moffitt, of Duke University, recommends -- guess what? -- giving them an allowance, along with help on how to manage it. Good advice. All of this was fascinating but not that surprising. In fact, it was encouraging to get academic backup for the real-world advice I’ve been giving for a long time. For example, it makes sense to me that lessons about life insurance and Social Security wouldn’t be “sticky” for high school students. But sticking them with the responsibility of paying for their own clothing or cell phone does make an impression. That’s why I’ve always been a big advocate of an allowance that’s tied to financial responsibilities (see 7 Tricky kids-and-Money Challenges to Anticipate). Based on what I heard at the conference, I’ll stick with some other good advice: Advertisement Don’t rush things. Children, like adults, operate on a need-to-know basis, so teach them lessons that are age-appropriate and don’t overwhelm them with information (see 6 Key Questions Before You Teach Kids About Money). If you begin an allowance around age 6 or 7, which is a good time to start, keep it simple by giving kids one financial responsibility (perhaps purchasing their favorite collectibles) that you can build on later. Nothing beats a first paycheck for giving teens a crash course in taxes. And high school students may not care much about retirement, but when your college grad gets her first job and has to sign up for the 401 (k) plan, I guarantee you’ll get a phone call asking for help. Make it fun. In my experience, the best way to get students interested in learning about money is to entertain them. Mandell’s research shows that playing a stock market game is far more efficient at promoting financial literacy than taking a class in personal finance. In the classroom, I’d also recommend other hands-on games that let kids make real-world decisions about choosing a career, buying a home and paying the bills. And any kind of competition (like a raucous game of financial soccer that I recently witnessed) gets them pumped and increases the chances that they’ll remember the lesson even after they’ve taken the exam. Follow Janet’s updates at Twitter.com/JanetBodnar.